I included a JMH benchmark and the results follow. The
implementation in this PR takes no more than 1/10th
of the time when compared to trunk. I also included
results for an alternative implementation that is a little
slower than the one in the PR.
Trunk:
```text
TopicBenchmark.testValidate topic avgt 15 134.107 ± 3.956 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate longer-topic-name avgt 15 316.241 ± 13.379 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate very-long-topic-name_with_more_text avgt 15 636.026 ± 30.272 ns/op
```
Implementation in the PR:
```text
TopicBenchmark.testValidate topic avgt 15 13.153 ± 0.383 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate longer-topic-name avgt 15 26.139 ± 0.896 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate very-long-topic-name.with_more_text avgt 15 44.829 ± 1.390 ns/op
```
Alternative implementation where boolean validChar = Character.isLetterOrDigit(c) || c == '.' || c == '_' || c == '-';
```text
TopicBenchmark.testValidate topic avgt 15 18.883 ± 1.044 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate longer-topic-name avgt 15 36.696 ± 1.220 ns/op
TopicBenchmark.testValidate very-long-topic-name_with_more_text avgt 15 65.956 ± 0.669 ns/op
```
Author: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Reviewers: Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
Closes#3234 from ijuma/optimise-topic-is-valid
Author: Mario Molina <mmolimar@gmail.com>
Reviewers: Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>, Damian Guy <damian.guy@gmail.com>, Michael G. Noll <michael@confluent.io>, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
Closes#3017 from mmolimar/KAFKA-5218
Author: Rajini Sivaram <rajinisivaram@googlemail.com>
Reviewers: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#3137 from rajinisivaram/KAFKA-5320
Includes server-side code, protocol and AdminClient.
Author: Colin P. Mccabe <cmccabe@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2941 from cmccabe/KAFKA-3266
Author: Colin P. Mccabe <cmccabe@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Dan Norwood <norwood@confluent.io>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2472 from cmccabe/KAFKA-3265
Author: Apurva Mehta <apurva@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>, Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
Closes#2840 from apurvam/exactly-once-transactional-clients
Enable producer per task if exactly-once config is enabled.
Author: Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Eno Thereska <eno@confluent.io>, Damian Guy <damian.guy@gmail.com>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2773 from mjsax/exactly-once-streams-producer-per-task
Author: Matthias J. Sax <matthias@confluent.io>
Author: Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
Author: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Apurva Mehta <apurva@confluent.io>, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2799 from mjsax/kafka-4990-add-api-stub-config-parameters-request-types
This PR replaces https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/2743 (just raising from Confluent repo)
This PR describes the addition of Partition Level Leader Epochs to messages in Kafka as a mechanism for fixing some known issues in the replication protocol. Full details can be found here:
[KIP-101 Reference](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-101+-+Alter+Replication+Protocol+to+use+Leader+Epoch+rather+than+High+Watermark+for+Truncation)
*The key elements are*:
- Epochs are stamped on messages as they enter the leader.
- Epochs are tracked in both leader and follower in a new checkpoint file.
- A new API allows followers to retrieve the leader's latest offset for a particular epoch.
- The logic for truncating the log, when a replica becomes a follower, has been moved from Partition into the ReplicaFetcherThread
- When partitions are added to the ReplicaFetcherThread they are added in an initialising state. Initialising partitions request leader epochs and then truncate their logs appropriately.
This test provides a good overview of the workflow `EpochDrivenReplicationProtocolAcceptanceTest.shouldFollowLeaderEpochBasicWorkflow()`
The corrupted log use case is covered by the test
`EpochDrivenReplicationProtocolAcceptanceTest.offsetsShouldNotGoBackwards()`
Remaining work: There is a do list here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1edmMo70MfHEZH9x38OQfTWsHr7UGTvg-NOxeFhOeRew/edit?usp=sharing
Author: Ben Stopford <benstopford@gmail.com>
Author: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
Reviewers: Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
Closes#2808 from benstopford/kip-101-v2
This is from the KIP-98 proposal.
The main points of discussion surround the correctness logic, particularly the Log class where incoming entries are validated and duplicates are dropped, and also the producer error handling to ensure that the semantics are sound from the users point of view.
There is some subtlety in the idempotent producer semantics. This patch only guarantees idempotent production upto the point where an error has to be returned to the user. Once we hit a such a non-recoverable error, we can no longer guarantee message ordering nor idempotence without additional logic at the application level.
In particular, if an application wants guaranteed message order without duplicates, then it needs to do the following in the error callback:
1. Close the producer so that no queued batches are sent. This is important for guaranteeing ordering.
2. Read the tail of the log to inspect the last message committed. This is important for avoiding duplicates.
Author: Apurva Mehta <apurva@confluent.io>
Author: hachikuji <jason@confluent.io>
Author: Apurva Mehta <apurva.1618@gmail.com>
Author: Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>
Author: fpj <fpj@apache.org>
Author: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>, Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>
Closes#2735 from apurvam/exactly-once-idempotent-producer
Author: Colin P. Mccabe <cmccabe@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>, Apurva Mehta <apurva@confluent.io>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2691 from cmccabe/KAFKA-4902
Author: Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>
Reviewers: Jun Rao <junrao@gmail.com>, Apurva Mehta <apurva@confluent.io>, Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2614 from hachikuji/exactly-once-message-format
Author: Damian Guy <damian.guy@gmail.com>
Reviewers: Guozhang Wang <wangguoz@gmail.com>, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <me@ewencp.org>, Jason Gustafson <jason@confluent.io>, Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk>
Closes#2594 from dguy/checkstyle