Prior to this commit many imagedata elements were duplicated in
order to configure PDF sizes. Since HTML generation is configured
to ignore image scaling altogether this was unnecessary duplication.
Issue: SPR-10033
diagram.</emphasis><!--First it says diagram illustrates scope, but then says it's not typical of a prototype scope. Why not use realistic one? --></para>
@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ The footnote should x-ref to first section in that chapter but I can't find the
@@ -112,8 +112,7 @@ The footnote should x-ref to first section in that chapter but I can't find the
@ -99,14 +99,8 @@ TR: This section doesn't read well and I think we should try to rewrite it.-->Nu
@@ -99,14 +99,8 @@ TR: This section doesn't read well and I think we should try to rewrite it.-->Nu
Instrumentation, and Test, as shown in the following diagram.</para>
@ -721,14 +721,10 @@ would be rolled back, not necessarily following the EJB rules-->
@@ -721,14 +721,10 @@ would be rolled back, not necessarily following the EJB rules-->
TR: OK AS IS. images don't show up in the editor, but they do show up in the generated docs-->
@ -1869,17 +1865,11 @@ TR: REVISED, PLS REVIEW - changed it back; it's not just settings, the section d
@@ -1869,17 +1865,11 @@ TR: REVISED, PLS REVIEW - changed it back; it's not just settings, the section d
@ -1916,7 +1906,7 @@ TR: REVISED, PLS REVIEW - changed it back; it's not just settings, the section d
@@ -1916,7 +1906,7 @@ TR: REVISED, PLS REVIEW - changed it back; it's not just settings, the section d